Visar inlägg med etikett nonviolent communication. Visa alla inlägg
Visar inlägg med etikett nonviolent communication. Visa alla inlägg

4/12/2008

Loud thinking…

from a walk April 17, 2007.

[Updated in the evening, see the end] I thought yesterday about writing about my role as teacher, triggered by both this and that probably during a long time, and my possible influence on young people – in a negative sense. Of course? What do I have to contribute with?

But there was so much at work, so I hadn’t time writing then. And now it feels as I don’t have that inspiration or drive any longer. Probably temporary. But I will make a try.

I think we as grown ups aren’t aware of what we are doing always despite all good intentions. But as long as we try to have a good communication we can at least talk about these things.

And still, I don’ feel like a real grown up, am still feeling like a girl… What are they calling it in the co-dependency movement? “Grown up child”?

I got the great honour joining eight speech-lessons with my oldest nephew and two of his friends (they were 20 years and just below) and his sister (my niece, then soon 16 years) a little more than a year ago. And the speech-teacher said after our first initial telephone-calls that she thought I was younger than I was… I felt very ambivalent about this...

Sounding very kind? And nonthreatening? Mom’s cheerful girl? So she wouldn’t get bent to the ground, as a lousy and bad mother? Not adding to the burden of guilt on her shoulders? And not threatening dad with being a strong, competent woman?

Miller writes about a longing and wish to communicate directly, openly without taboos or ideological walls. Yes, many f us have that longing, but not always consciously? Many of us aren’t even really aware of it? Noone has helped us put words on it?

She writes in Path of Life that she thinks she has developed a greater patience by the years, because she thinks she doesn’t have to prove to other people something that is obvious to her any longer.

With time she has become more tolerant and patient she writes. She thinks she can wait for others easier than she has been able earlier, and that she can give others the time they need to convert or transform her thoughts in action.

The fact that she hasn’t felt less alone as twenty years ago (today thirty years ago?) has helped her in this she thinks.

Many people, autodidacts and professionals (fact-people) have with time confirmed her thesis, expanded and broadened them from their own experiences, both inspired by her and also totally independently.

She thinks it was very painful realising what she had done to her children of pure ignorance. What she neglected for their and her own sake. She thinks it was (and I guess it still is, when she today realises more and more) painful realising that with more information many things could have developed differently and better, and that much isn’t possible to get back. Things you can’t make it undone. For some this can be so painful so they don’t begrudge other people (many times own children) other and much better experiences?

She writes that most women she knows are glad that they at least today are better informed than earlier about how a small child sees the world and better informed about its most vital needs. The increased knowledge makes it easier to have a more open dialogue with their now grown up children and develop a new understanding for their grandchildren.

But still she thinks these people amount to a minority.

She writes that many get depressed when they one day with astonishment realises or establishes how they in their relation to not least their children and partner are lacking the freedom which they have longed from since their youth. Not always consciously longing?

Maybe they then feel as if they were in a sort of blind alley or dead end (återvändsgränd). As children they couldn’t find their way out. They had no choices, had to adapt to the environment, and as grown ups they don’t even know they have any alternatives.

If we get more aware about those stampings (??) we don’t have to behave like automats.

And yes, how does one handle these things as grown up?

How does one react when one sees things, or think one sees things? What is about me and what is about the other part? Now I am thinking about what I see among children and young people… And what I see in the interaction between children and parents. When it comes not only to pupils, but also to siblings, cousins, friends’ children?

So I act in a way that isn’t harmful for anyone, but constructive…

And also; how do I avoid myself too adding damage? And how do I handle if I see things colleagues do? How do we talk about these things?

The best way would be trying to work on ones own issues? And try to find people with whom one could talk about these things with (face to face would be the best?), in a non-moralizing way?

PS. This afternoon our Youth Symphony Orchestra has 25-year jubilee, with concert and buffet after the concert. Former colleagues coming...

There's a lot more I would want to blog about: the school... For instance a long article about our grade system (which has been and is a hot debate here) in the teacher's paper, which I got yesterday, and Education at a Glance, a report from OECD I was tipped about by a friend (a shorter version than the linked though), which I have printed out and started to read here and there. And, no, it isn't really about education at a glance (med en flyktig blick)! This report is 451 pages long, but my shorter version is "only" 58 pages long.

There's a backlash in society? Our current school minister is very authoritarian I think.

At wikipedia it stands about his political views (I didn't vote for this government, whose politics I don't like...):

"Björklund is often seen as a representative of the more right-wing, hard-edged faction of the Liberal Party. He has focused most on school issues, where he is known for his support for orderliness and discipline. He has criticized the Swedish schools system for being to 'muddled' and not focusing enough on knowledge. Among other things, he has advocated more frequent assessments and a reformed grade system.

In 2002, as first deputy chairman of his party, Björklund expressed his support for the coming U.S. invasion of Iraq and urged for Swedish participation in the multinational coalition."

Updated in the evening: In a programme at the Swedish TV Beckman, Ohlson and Can, with for instance our current school minister (se above) and the director Suzanne Osten (her home site in English), they spoke about our “muddled” school - and “muddled” society in general (a deep sigh).

Osten said something I think was worth thinking of, a little freely related by me:

“Scared people are screaming about ‘muddle’ (flum)! They try to find one single solution to all problems! A kind of black-white thinking. We want to define all human weakness away. We have a dream of a hero [a father-figure, hard but just?], who shall come there and save us [the Swedish professor in religion-psychology Owe Wikström wrote something similar in one of his recent books; that he feared people would scream for tough leaders]. We live in a loveless society!”

They also spoke of the school achievements in countries like Finland and Korea (top ranked one of them said, which probably is true if I remember the OECD-document right I have skimmed and started to read), where the school-system is much harder than here. But Osten pointed out that these two nations are relatively respectively (my history knowledge isn't especially fresh! Thanks to our lousy school? Or thanks to how hard it is to teach me something? But yes, I have my thoughts about my schools) much younger than our society, and still have something to strive for and look forward to. They still have a drive. But we are lacking this! I agree.

Actually the Swedish actress Lena Endre said something about this in an interview many years ago, that there are noone among all our leaders and politicians who have visions for our society (something positive worth striving for), and she sounded upset over this.

They also spoke about how “we” (who are those "we"??? Maybe I'm remembering wrong what they actually said) rely on the society in all situations. Björklund mentioned (took as an example) a mom in a meeting at her 9-year old daughter’s school just outside Stockholm, where the mom said to the headmaster and all other parents and the teacher/s that she thought the school should look so the kids weren’t out at town at 9 PM!!! Of course one can wonder if THIS is the school's duty?? But this Björklund sees this single event as a sign for how we push responsibility away (all of us) and a need for teahing people personal responsibility (my free interpretation!) and of course he also advocate “harder grips”? Is this, one and only event, representative and to what degree? And if it is; what would the proper “medicine” be? I don't believe in his ideas (and I don't think Osten and the other two women did either).

We are too spoiled?

Many politicians are so fond of speaking about the individual’s responsibility today… Putting the emphasis on this. I just sigh. Of course I think we all have responsibility for ourselves, but there is a but... And this (authoritarian talk?) is applauded by many (??). I wonder: must the one exclude the other? The individuals and the society's responsibility I mean.

And why have people put everything in the hands of society – if they have? What are the roots for this?

And as always, some are overly responsible taking (but they are forgotten in the societal debate) and some are pushing their personal responsibility far away? But actually how many suffer from the latter “disease”.

3/29/2008

Bewitched...











From the ballet "Trolltagen" (or"Bewitched") in Storforsen, Pite river, Älvsbyn. I have been here, but haven't seen this ballet.

A child has hundred languages but is robbed of ninety-nine…

I wrote a blogposting on my other blog, a posting I have thought of writing for quite a long time. About a dancer and dance-pedagogue Eva Dahlgren, 92 years, who introduced “child-dance in school” in Sweden 30 years ago (see this link about such an "activity" that looked very nice). I am interested in dance too. I have danced ballet one year when I was 9, and jazz dance as grown up. And accompanied dance when we introduced it at my work-place a little more than 15 years ago. I sew between 12-15 ballet-skirts then, they are still used I think...

On one of the pictures I linked it stood:

Kroppen som talar.

  • Inifrån det egna jaget
  • Känslomässiga upplevelser
  • Att förstå andra
  • Kroppsliga erfarenheter
  • Utvecklar medfödda och grundläggande förmågor
  • Stimulerar känslo- och tankemönster.

Translated it would be something in the style:

The body which speaks.

  • From the own self
  • Emotional experiences
  • To understand other people [one way, among (many) other, in processing things?]
  • Bodily experiences [expresses what we have experienced?]
  • Develops inborn and fundamental, basic faculties, powers, capacities.
  • Stimulates feelings and thought patterns.

But it's probably not easy (and sometimes not even possible) for children to enjoy dancing or expressing themselves? I can have experienced this too. But my activities were many times about survival??? Fantasizing and doing things...

I came to think about Reggio Emilia a “school-system” created after WW II as a reaction to what happened then and to avoid something similar to occur (if I remember right)?

Their idea is that:

"A child has a hundred languages but is robbed of ninety-nine. Schools and culture separate the head from the body, they force you to think without a body and to act without a head. Play and work, reality and imagination, science and the fantastic, the inside and the outside, are made into each other’s opposites.”

The body, body and facial expressions (and dance) is one way in expressing one’s self… Music is another. Painting and drawing are other expressions. We also have words, language, tone of voice… But we have a brain, intellect, intelligence too!! And thoughts, feelings, emotions, fantasy, imaginations...

I was interested in the school subjects (learning things etc.), and in all artistic expressions I think, not only music, but also dancing (I have been singing in choir since I was child, but am no "choir-person" strikes me, despite I sang in choir as child already, the only one of my siblings!!), theater, drawing/painting, writing, sewing, creating things with my hands... The only thing I haven't really devoted myself to is athletics!!! But I rode all my teens almost every day (as we had three ponies). And I had strong legs and a good VO2-max!! But something made me unsure in my body?? If it wasn't about dancing!? And today I enjoy walking (with poles), cycling, and things like "Friskis&Svettis" doing exercise to music (also see here) and if I had had the opportunity it would be fun to dance (jazz, ballet) or riding horses...

Aren't they cute???

I have also thought of writing about hypochondria (more or less severe)...

2/09/2008

Traditional moral among professionals...

A readers' letter on Miller's web from July 01, 2006:

"Dear Alice Miller,

I’ve been digesting the following for more than a week I think.

A couple of words got stuck from a Readers’ mail on this web (the one from June 19 'The System of Lies'): 'lies they have been told early in their lives', 'the lies of our moral system' gave me an aha-experience I think.

I have read all your books except one and reread them time and again. Have also read Stettbacher, Jenson and Bosch. I am now reading 'Trauma and Recovery' by Judith Herman Lewis and have skimmed Jennifer Freyd’s 'Betrayal Trauma'.

Something in the last two books has made me confused, feeling uncomfortable, despite a lot of awareness in them… I haven’t been able to put the finger on what it was, but when I read that Readers’ mail I suddenly thought I had got it. Although Herman is very brave I think she is still caught in traditional moral, which means caught in the commandment 'You shall honour thy father and thy mother…'

She writes (p. 52) about 'developmental conflicts of childhood and adolescence, long since resolved are suddenly reopened. Trauma forces the survivor to relive all her earlier struggles over autonomy, initiative, competence, identity, and intimacy.' As if all these things would be difficult or a struggle if a child was really respected and loved! I doubt it would be like this, if the child hadn’t been abused in one or another way.

She also writes on the same page that a child has to learn 'to control her bodily functions and to form and express her own point of view.”'But this is also traditional moral I think. With the purpose to hide what actually was done to the child.

On the next page (p. 53) she also writes: 'Unsatisfactory resolutions of the normal developmental conflicts over autonomy leaves the person prone to shame and doubt /…/ Unsatisfactory solutions of the normal developmental conflicts over initiative and competence leaves the person prone to feelings of guilt and inferiority.' This also is to hide what the child actually has been exposed to and that there are clear reasons for conflict, there would be no, or much fewer conflicts for the child and struggles with developing if the child was met with respect and got its needs filled I think. I think I have difficulties to put what I feel very strongly inside in words.

On page 64 she also writes about 'struggling with the same developmental issues of aggression and self-control as his pre-school child. The trauma of combat had undone whatever resolution of these issues he had attained in early life /…/ Women traumatized in sexual and domestic life struggle with the similar issues of self-regulation.'

Using the words 'self-regulation' and 'self-control' as if there is something evil in the child that has to be controlled and regulated actually! But does it come from something inside, something inherited? Or from things the child actually has experienced? I think it is the latter. And think so the more I read you and other Readers’ mails on this cite and communicate these thoughts with others, articulate them and put them in print. To put it in print makes them more real.

That we as adults need to control ourselves is another question. Probably we need that! On us one can have much higher demands, and shall have higher. We have a responsibility for what we do and say to others, all of us, no matter how much or little power we have. In fact the one with more power perhaps also have more responsibilities?

This was actually no real questions to you, just some thoughts I got and wanted to forward, fast and spontaneously written a very warm summers-day.

Yours sincerely
M. J.

AM: Thank you for your letter. I am glad that thanks to this mailbox you gained more awareness concerning the traditional moral in the language of professionals because to make this clear was my purpose when I decided to open this page. Psychoanalysts now go so far to admit that some patients were not 'loved enough' in childhood. But they are still far away from recognizing that most of us had to survive TORTURE when our creativity was stifled so that our parents could finally obtain the obedient child they apparently needed. In their language many therapists avoid to be 'judgmental' and you can feel in this hesitation the fear of a small child that could be punished for 'talking back'."

Miller on Marshall Rosenberg’s nonviolent communication (my italics):

The method of Marshall Rosenberg is very nice and may be helpful to people who have not be[been??] severely mistreated in childhood. The latter ones however must find their pent up, LEGITIMATE rage and free themselves from the lies of our moral system. As long as they don't do this, their body will continue to scream for the truth with the help of symptoms."