photos taken with my mobile phone camera just before lunch during a 25 minutes quick walk from town (need to get my bike fixed, so I cycled to town and had to walk home).
[Updated April 16, see the end] A blogger writes that critical examination of science, research, scientific reports and material is the core in science and exactly what makes science more reliable, in long term, than only (pure) thinking (she had seen a TV-program on a case about research on ADHD - Christopher Gillberg in Gothenburg). Without possibilities to such examinations the science isn’t much better than whatever general thinking she writes. She writes that when a researcher prevents the, for all science, basic controlling of a researcher’s work then he isn’t a serious researcher any longer.
She writes something about scientific-methodological grounds…
Yes, that about questioning… And things which cannot be examined or questioned - what's that about? Both here and there... Also see earlier posting on similar topics?
And one cannot just mechanistically change the state of affairs in ones life? Or one CAN, but isn't that exactly as one has behaved and done ones whole life, and what has this meant and led to?
Has energy been bound up (with all which follows from that)? I don't know...
Addition April 16: Read this blogposting on the blog Biology and Politics, which is more about the Academic world (this posting is though in Swedish)...
Inlägg
