Visar inlägg med etikett trauma and the brain. Visa alla inlägg
Visar inlägg med etikett trauma and the brain. Visa alla inlägg

8/27/2009

Child abuse and its effects…





Corporal punishment prohibited in schools and the home (green) Corporal punishment prohibited in schools only (blue) Corporal punishment not prohibited (red)


Read “What doesn't kill you makes you stronger: true or false? A discussion of the effects of child abuse” by Sarah Eberhardt and also read about corporal punishment in Europe and USA.



2/07/2009

The root of all evil…

I got tipped about this video by a very close and dear friend:-):

About the video:
”Jill Mytton left a religious cult as a young adult [together with her parents, when she was 16 years old], and now helps counsel people who are struggling with life after leaving cult environments.”

On Richard Dawkins see here.

Addition in the evening: Also see Mic Hunter on what sexual abuse is and how to define it and a review of his book “Abused Boys: The Neglected Victims of Sexual Abuse”.


Addition February 8: Mytton says that she doesn't blame her parents for what she experienced, because they were harmed in turn. But I think such a view can be (is) problematic if you really want a client (or you yourself) to recover. Miller for instance has written a lot about this, see on her site about forgiveness...


How many children haven't "understood" their parents through?? And what has this led to? Has this protected and prevented the latter grown up from doing the same thing, or similar things again? The conduct of forgiveness easily leads to denial about what's actually violating a child... But it is applauded in the society.


Also see what violations actually are.


Pia Mellody (and probably some other therapists/experts) writes/talks about these things too, see about defenses (but many so called experts are probably denying the problems with understanding our parents and early caregivers). Also see here on defenses.

1/15/2009

IFS-therapy…

We don’t need more disintegration but more integration. From what I have understood about IFS-therapy: Imagining that we have different parts in us whom we can speak to (and who can speak to each other?) doesn’t support integration?


About inner child work:

“…letting clients imagine that they can get now or do now what they couldn’t then [by for instance giving their ‘inner children’ what they didn’t get then] undermines the healing process, even though clients experience relief in the short run.” (Bosch page 101).

And about (maybe solely) using our intellect (neo cortex) to understand and imagine what’s behind our current problems:

“…if we misinterpret the cause of the feeling we can inadvertently hinder the healing process, since in order to heal, it is important to be aware that a specific feeling goes back to something (be it a general or specific situation) and let ourselves feel that.” (Bosch page 101).

Jenson writes, in my maybe a little free interpretation: if we unconsciously rewrite our history the failure is unavoidable.


Because we want to avoid the truth to whatever prize, because it is so painful. Either we remember through feeling anxiety etc. OR we remember what we were exposed to but not with the feelings that should have been adequate, appropriate and connected to the event(s).


The child had to deny what happened, to different degrees, and needed to do so to survive. As adults we continue with this denial, because the truth is still so painful, but therapists mean that we can survive the truth about then today… But we need appropriate help with “confronting” (I am not sure this is the appropriate or right word, because I am not sure it’s about confrontation in the “aggressive” meaning) it.


If we try to fill childhood needs as adults it will always cause problems of different kinds and degrees therapists (Bosch and Jenson for instance) mean.


But I think we shall be very careful with choosing therapist. I think Miller is right there. See what she has written, in for instance the revised version of The Drama. Not least about regression (and primal) therapy.


In the meantime we can break silence by talking about those things or just by informing ourselves? And thus hopefully tear some, or in the best case, many barriers down and maybe this is the only help the less harmed need?


On top, a central message in Miller’s book “Paths of Life” is that the path to recovery differs from person to person, illustrated by the seven scenarios in this book. What is much less needed is a method (whatever sort) rather than a listening ear and empathy?

10/12/2008

Movie about Bulgaria’s Abandoned Children...


Watch the film about Bulgaria’s Abandoned Children,” what the worst cases of child abuse can cause.

Addition October 14: Things are happening in our society too, see the site “Breaking the Silence – to Stop the Cycle of Pain” and also see “Wall of Tears – Book of Tears.”

6/10/2008

Traumas and changes in the brain...

Areas in the brain that has minor volume of grey matter, among those who were in the nearness of the terrorist-attack. All areas, which are light in colour on this picture, are areas that are connected with emotions. (Foto: Barbara Ganzel/Cornell University)

”Traumas can change the brain” was the heading to an article I got a link to. It stands that evil experiences as those happening September 11 at World Trade Center can reduce the amount of grey matter in the brain. See "Resilience after 9/11: Multimodal neuroimaging evidence for stress-related change in the healthy adult brain" andBrain's gray cells appear to be changed by trauma of major events like 9/11 attack, a study suggests.

Unprocessed trauma makes the brain vulnerable for new trauma? The less traumatized (or the more help an individual has gotten to process difficult things from early in life r later in a successful, proper therapy) the less vulnerable, the more easily you can process difficult life-events later. What Jenson says!! Unprocessed traumas influence our ability to process later traumas so we can go on in life better.

I had to look in Jenson’s book again. Yes, she writes at page 36 that another serious consequence of a permanent suppression is the distortion (förvrängning) the unconscious forces us to. She means that we aren’t aware of what and how we are actually behaving and doing (these defence and survival strategies comes automatically, and have become as a part of ourselves, in my understanding and interpretation of her, we need to learn to recognize them first), for instance trying to change oneself in hope of getting appreciation and/or be spared abuse and violations.

An inborn ability to process experiences is damaged. And she means that to be capable of processing things realistically and in full a person needs to see clearly what’s happening in a given situation. When there is a high degree of denial clear perception is rather exception than rule. The unconscious distorts the individual’s experiences without her/him being aware of it.

Suppression damages a very important human capacity namely the ability to process experiences, something which is important for a sound, satisfying life. And the results of these inabilities are often quite tragic I would frankly say.

Of course this influences later difficult experiences and our capacity to process them constructively.

And that is what the researchers have seeing the research that is referred to?

See wikipedia according grey matter in the brain, and the ACE-reporter nr. 4 ”Adverse Childhood Experiences and Stress: Paying the Piper” where it for instance stands:

“…the ACE Study data [was analyzed] against demonstrated neurobiological defects that result from early trauma, changes to areas of the brain that mediate mood, anxiety, healthy bonding with other people, memory, and even where our bodies store fat.

After careful analysis, what they found is that ‘early experiences can have profound long-term effects on the biological systems that govern responses to stress…Disturbances [in neuron-development] at a critical time early in life may exert a disproportionate influence, creating the conditions for childhood and adult depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress symptoms.’

These shared findings have ‘the potential to unify and improve our understanding of many seemingly unrelated, but often co-morbid [occurring at the same time] health and social problems that have historically been seen and treated as categorically independent in Western culture.’

Why is this important? First, it is important to recognize that our ‘functional neuroanatomical and physiologic systems are interactive and integrated and that behaviors and health problems cannot generally be attributed to the function of any single or particular system.’ Our bodies’ systems work together. Therefore, treating one aspect of a problem, without addressing the other aspects, cannot possibly solve the problem completely.

Comprehending this essential relationship can help improve both preventive and primary care medicine, giving patients and their caregivers the information they need to achieve the best possible health and social outcomes.

Second, this convergence of colleagues and their data ‘adds support for numerous effects of childhood adverse experiences on physical health.

Stress is known from animal studies to be associated with a broad range of effects on physical health, including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, asthma, metabolic abnormalities, obesity, infection and other physical disorders.’ These findings provide the sort of substance that governments, organizations, and people in general typically require to become engaged, and to take action.

Without scientific data, the long-term effects of childhood trauma are otherwise easily brushed aside in favor of a more comfortable and convenient denial of the problem.

Third, we now know that ‘retrospective reports of childhood abuse [that was documented at the time of its occurrence] are likely to underestimate actual occurrence…[due to] effects of traumatic stress in childhood on the hippocampus’. In other words, the incidence of child abuse is probably much greater than is reported, and even greater than remembered and acknowledged by the victims themselves. Not only is such trauma protected by secrecy and shame, but by the function of our own brains.

Equally important, this multi-disciplinary approach to research encourages future collaboration among scientists, all working at solving different pieces of what we are beginning to understand is the same puzzle. As the puzzle takes shape, the pipers lose ground.”

In wikipedia it stands about the grey matter:

“Grey matter is distributed at the surface of the cerebral hemispheres (cerebral cortex) and of the cerebellum (cerebellar cortex), as well as in the depth of the cerebral (thalamus; hypothalamus; subthalamus, basal ganglia - putamen, globus pallidus, nucleus accumbens; septal nuclei), cerebellar (deep cerebellar nuclei - dentate nucleus, globose nucleus, emboliform nucleus, fastigial nucleus), brainstem (substantia nigra, red nucleus, olivary nuclei, cranial nerve nuclei) and spinal grey matter (anterior horn, lateral horn, posterior horn).

The function of gray matter is to route sensory or motor stimulus to interneurons of the CNS in order to create a response to the stimulus through chemical synapse activity. Gray matter structures (cortex, deep nuclei) process information originating in the sensory organs or in other gray matter regions. This information is conveyed via specialized nerve cell extensions (long axons), which form the bulk of the cerebral, cerebellar, and spinal white matter.”

See earlier postings on the brain and also the posting on hysteria and neocortex.