The responsibility for the society is shared by all...

my student playing and singing.

In the report ”The responsibility for the society is shared by all” you can read:

”The conception that the individual's independency increases if the political decisions are thrust back in favor of the market is false; even 'the market' is built on societal structures posing limits for the individual.

It is on the whole no matter of course that the individual's freedom increases because the politics is drawn back. If the void after the politics is taken care of by other organized interests, or if inequal power conditions makes so certain groups can increase their manouvre space on behalf of other people, the netto result may well become decreasing freedom for many.”

Cynicism...

“Cynicism, the term has several different meanings. The most popular meaning aim at an almost cold (callous) outlook on life (maybe even free from illusions and a belief on the worst concerning mankind). It can even allude to just seeing the human being and/or the society as it is, without having an effect on accepted or conventional norms. The latter meaning is actually more correct when the term utmost originates from the Cynics in ancient Greece which didn’t advocate frigidity but independency and self-control. One of the most well-known cynics were Diogenes from Sinope.”

”…for a propagandist [also see here on propagandist] like [Johan] Norberg it must be great that a lot of people believe what he is paid to make them believe.

The considerably more interesting question about what political economical system which is the best for most people he and his soul mates aren’t concerning themselves with of explainable reasons. They bravely fight further on the power’s side and for the power’s sake, an always equally admirable fight [Kerstin, commentator on Esbati's blog].”

”So if the tea bag revolution this week doesn’t succeed maybe Norberg pushes off over the puddle and helps the Americans or in any case Wall Street getting their freedom back [Lennart, commentator on Esbati’s blog].”

”The more and more desperate republicans are trying to revolt against president Obama through organizing ‘tea parties’ now just before taxation day April 15.

‘Tea Bagging’ refers back to the Boston Tea Party 1773 that is seen as the starting point for the American Revolution against the Englishmen. The American settlers in Boston refused to accept the taxes on tea because they hadn’t been allowed to decide about them.

With other words the republicans want to start a national revolution towards president Obama and his government in protest against his trials to solve the catastrophic economical crisis here in USA. Talk about extremism!

But one can’t be really sure where one has those extreme republicans. Maybe it’s only about sex here, something the republicans and their nucleus squads in the Christian Right never have learned to handle [from the blog ‘Det progressiva USA’. My addition: WHAT phenomenon (maybe one should be careful saying 'who' quite ironically!??) caused the catastrophic economical crisis? And WHO have to pay for it (quite ironically)? Who are going to suffer most from this crisis? The wealthiest, i.e. the ones which after all have (financial and economical) margins? Or the man on the street? Small entrepreneurs etc.? Who are 'punished' for it? And who are maybe unfairly blamed for it (the man on the street)? And who are defended and protected?]."

Pippi...

A reflection all of a sudden: Pippi, the rebel, meant a lot for Tommy and Annika?? The two well-mannered children. With her attitude of questioning things, her way of living, her whole appearance... Stockings in two different colors, the shoes and cloths, the red-hair... Slept with her shoes on and the feet on the pillow... Let her horse walk into he house. When she should clean the floors in her house she put the brushes on her feet and skated around there!!

"Can one really do like that???"

Look at the picture below! Tommy and Annika peeping over the fence, with big eyes and dropped chins!!

But how was it actually for Pippi? Under the surface? Did she hide something? Did she sacrifice something? Was she allowed to express everything or only certain things?

"I have my monkey and horse and the house Villavillekulla, and a lot of money..."

Strong independent... Not needy... I wonder with a lump in my throat..

PS. And the grown up world found themselves in this? That a child lived alone in a big house. No, they tried to put Pippi on a children's home, even tried to force her there with the help of two constables, but Pippi refused to be taken there. The constables couldn't handle her. Pippi was so strong so she lifted them up and threatened them with throwing them away. Or did she actually throw them away? I don't remember (how many children wish they could do that or something like that? That they had the strength to protect themselves? Even if it isn't verbalized or thought in real thoughts?).

Of two bad things she choose the less bad; to have the (relative) freedom living in her own house, with her monkey and horse...

And if one should take this further to real life and real children!!?? Struck me...

PPS. And that about women's voices: are they needed to be heard, or...? You can really wonder... Do we need them at all?? Do women have anything to say? Do they have anything to contribute with? Or do only some have something to say? And what is the most important: what you say or how you say it, seen formally...?

When people raise their voices it must be done in a certain way? And even more if it is woman raising her voice? Then she must do it perfectly??? And not so seldom she has these demands on herself too?? Even if she dares to put them aside, or challenge this by nevertheless raise her voice and try to communicate and speak out loud, despite if how she says it isn't perfect seen to grammar etc.

How many voices have been silenced on the road?

And who keep on raising their voices? Not troubled of the impression they make? Who are more bothered an concerned about the outer appearance even if one maybe don't think they do??

Silently wondering... In fact not so gladly...

It has been things on this road, so now it is soon too much???

But my wish and need to express things has been greater than all self-criticism, and it still seems to be a little greater than this criticism... Because after all, I don't think I am totally stupid?? That I don't realize my limitations at all... Because I do? Or don't I?

Once again, concerning my work, research has found that women have more problems with stage-fright than men... What can this mean? Even there women's voices have become silent?

And it's not only talent or capacity that are the prerequisites for a career as musician, I think I read this recently in a book I have referred to on another forum, that you need someone on the road believing in you and supporting you.

And in the music-history men are dominating... And they are still dominating... Even if things are better" there today. And, of course, men also can have handicapping troubles with stage-fright!!!

Who gets (the) support, and who gets less support???

Strikes me now about my youngest brother, during summer-vacation from his education (to medical engineer at college) he worked at hospital. He in fact reacted, with a smile (a little ironic??), that he thought he got differently treated than the young women...

But I am not at all striving for any career in this work!!! I am satisfied with how it is... Sometimes it feels as I would like to move out into nowhere and disappear...

Harshly beating myself, you stupid, lousy, bad... No, not so glad, no...

Working and working, tired to death!!! With this not said that anyone is forcing me! Of course it is "my own fault"!!!

I wonder what this is triggering: people talking above my head, as if I didn't exist? And had nothing to say? As if what I have to say is so shamy?? And the way I do it is too??

Struggling with this, and in fact challenging this side!?

The "funny thing" is that a female physician (psychiatrist and gestalt-therapist), I didn't visit as a client in therapy though, said to me that I should dare to do things less perfect or how I shall express it!! In a similar manner as a young woman sick-paid for exhaustion was encouraged to deliberately spell words wrong when she wrote, to challenge her perfectionism, allow herself to be more human or something like that...

And, what is behind or beyond (??) these perfectionist demands, or the rebellion against them (which doesn't exclude blushing cheeks)? Who help one with this? Who want to know about them? Maybe last of all a physician (the clever girl or boy)??

Astrid Lindgren's Emil, among her all other strong children-figures (many a bit rebellion!?), got a fairly high position in society... A position with societal power... Noone else of her figures did?? Pippi never grew up?? What happened to her?

Earlier postings on disobedient child (both in Swedish and in English).